docs(code-runtime-python): align the accepted-residual dep list across README and note

The residual bullets listed the encoder's transitive deps as an exhaustive set
but disagreed with each other and omitted io. Mark the list as a non-exhaustive
example (e.g. _dump_scalar/_dump_string/json/io) in the README (en + zh) and the
settlement note (en + zh); pairings re-recorded and consistent.

packages/code-runtime/code-runtime-python/README.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write packages/code-runtime/code-runtime-python/README.md
-README.md: 9184573748a2dd32c97fe92b6ae91ab89279516a
-README.zh.md: ff4698f06004a2da8e77cb8772a2b23d462d2361
+README.md: 18c784394705e7fc10f956bcbf7e576d6a0b4c83
+README.zh.md: 64424b7d2de8b96452469c3e65e47ed3d9a91adb

packages/code-runtime/code-runtime-python/README.md

@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ No direct invalidation; the named consumer owns any request-prefix changes.
 - **A combined log-and-value peak is not modelled by the load gate.** Each budget is checked against `addressSpaceMb` on its own. A model daemon thread that keeps writing while the completion value is metered and framed can refill the log pending toward `maxLogBytes` during that window, so the two peaks add in a way no gate admits or rejects. A gate over `(maxLogBytes + maxValueBytes)` was considered and deferred: its discriminating case cannot be scheduled deterministically under `RLIMIT_AS`, so the gate would only prove its own arithmetic. When the combined peak is reached the run dies as `worker-exit` -- containment holds and only the failure classification is degraded.
 - **A 1-second dual-limit `ulimit -t 1` CPU overrun is reported as `worker-exit`, not a timeout.** When the host starts under a hard CPU limit equal to the soft (`ulimit -t N` sets both) and that limit is 1, `_clamped` cannot lower the soft to 0, so the kernel SIGKILLs the busy loop in the same tick and SIGXCPU is never delivered. The host classifies a CPU overrun only on `signal === 'SIGXCPU'`, so the overrun is reported as `worker-exit`. For a dual limit of 2 or more the soft is lowered by one unit, SIGXCPU fires, and the run is a timeout. Containment holds in both cases; only the classification is degraded.
 - **A program that traps SIGXCPU can exceed the soft CPU limit during settlement encoding and still report success.** The settlement CPU recheck (`die_if_cpu_exhausted`) runs unconditionally after the program returns and before the log flush and completion encode; a program that exceeded the soft limit before returning is caught there and dies on the re-delivered SIGXCPU, classified as a timeout. The only false-success window is a program that PASSES the recheck and then, with SIGXCPU trapped, exceeds the soft limit during the settlement flush/encode window. A post-encode recheck is not done because it would charge the settlement encode's own CPU to the program, misclassifying a legitimate near-limit program. Containment holds — the hard limit (soft + 1s) and the wall clock still bound it — and only the classification is degraded.
-- **The encoder's direct dependencies resolve at call time.** `_encode_json_plain` reaches `_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json` via module-global lookup, so a program running as `__main__` that rebinds one of those names (e.g. `__main__._dump_scalar = boom`) after returning a legitimate value can make the encode throw and downgrade a success to `exception`. The value path's entry name (`_done_with_value`) is bound into `_run` locals and its top-level `_check_done_value`/`_encode_json_plain` are def-time defaults, but the encoder's transitive deps (`_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json`) still resolve at call time. This is an accepted residual: under the bash-equivalent trust model a rebind here only harms the model's own run, and the verdict still reaches the host — `send_done`'s fixed fallback frame delivers a done frame even when the error-path encode/write throws.
+- **The encoder's direct dependencies resolve at call time.** `_encode_json_plain` reaches `_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json` via module-global lookup, so a program running as `__main__` that rebinds one of those names (e.g. `__main__._dump_scalar = boom`) after returning a legitimate value can make the encode throw and downgrade a success to `exception`. The value path's entry name (`_done_with_value`) is bound into `_run` locals and its top-level `_check_done_value`/`_encode_json_plain` are def-time defaults, but the encoder's transitive deps (e.g. `_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json`/`io` — a non-exhaustive set) still resolve at call time. This is an accepted residual: under the bash-equivalent trust model a rebind here only harms the model's own run, and the verdict still reaches the host — `send_done`'s fixed fallback frame delivers a done frame even when the error-path encode/write throws.
 - **A wide binding REPLY expands host-side state per member.** Resolutions cross through `snapshotJsonValue` in [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session`](../../core/session/README.md), whose `walkJsonValue` pushes one task frame per member, and binding resolution carries no seam-level byte cap. A legitimate reply of several million elements can therefore exhaust the host heap. The property belongs to that shared walk, not to this backend -- the worker-thread backend consumes the same function -- so the fix belongs in `packages/core/session` where every consumer benefits.
 - **A cross-thread binding that the program joins with a synchronous `t.join()` can deadlock.** This is specific to the `process` isolation backend: the reply pump runs on the child's main event loop, so when the program's main coroutine calls `t.join()` on a worker thread that is still awaiting a binding reply, the join blocks the main thread's event loop — the loop the pump needs to deliver that reply — and the worker's `await` never resumes until the wall clock. The worker-thread backend does not share this structure, so the fix belongs here, not in `packages/core/session`.

packages/code-runtime/code-runtime-python/README.zh.md

@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ host 与 CPython 子进程在子进程的 fd 3 上交换一个无版本号的 JS
 - **日志与完成值的叠加峰值未被加载门建模。** 每项预算都是各自对照 `addressSpaceMb` 检查的。模型的 daemon 线程可以在完成值被计量并分帧的窗口内持续写入、把日志 pending 重填到接近 `maxLogBytes`，于是两个峰值以任何门都不曾放行也不曾拒绝的方式相加。对 `(maxLogBytes + maxValueBytes)` 设门的方案经评估后推迟：它的判别用例无法在 `RLIMIT_AS` 之下确定性地构造出来，因此该门只能证明自己的算术。叠加峰值被触及时该次运行死为 `worker-exit`——containment 仍然成立，只是失败分类失真。
 - **1 秒双限 `ulimit -t 1` 下的 CPU 超限会被报告为 `worker-exit`，而非超时。** 当宿主在一个硬 CPU 限制等于软限制（`ulimit -t N` 同时设置两者）且该限制为 1 的环境下启动时，`_clamped` 无法把软限制降到 0，因此内核在同一 tick 直接 SIGKILL 忙循环，SIGXCPU 永不送达。宿主只在 `signal === 'SIGXCPU'` 时把 CPU 超限分类为超时，因此该超限被报告为 `worker-exit`。当双限为 2 或更大时，软限制会被降低一个单位，SIGXCPU 触发，该次运行成为超时。两种情况 containment 都成立；只是分类被降级。
 - **一个 trap SIGXCPU 的程序可以在结算编码期间超过软 CPU 限制并仍报告成功。** 结算时的 CPU 复查（`die_if_cpu_exhausted`）在程序返回后、日志 flush 与完成值编码之前无条件运行；一个在返回前已超过软限制的程序会在这里死于重投递的 SIGXCPU，被归类为超时。唯一的误报窗口是一个通过复查后、trap 住 SIGXCPU 并在结算 flush/编码窗口内越过软限制的程序。不做编码后复查，是因为那会把结算编码自身消耗的 CPU 记到程序头上、误分类一个合法的近限程序。containment 成立——硬限制（软限制 + 1s）与墙钟仍会约束它——只是分类被降级。
-- **编码器的直接依赖在调用时解析。** `_encode_json_plain` 通过模块全局查找到达 `_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json`，因此以 `__main__` 运行的程序在返回合法值后重绑这些名字之一（例如 `__main__._dump_scalar = boom`）可以让编码抛出、把成功降级为 `exception`。值路径的入口名（`_done_with_value`）被绑定进 `_run` 局部、其顶层的 `_check_done_value`/`_encode_json_plain` 是 def 期默认值，但编码器的传递依赖（`_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json`）仍在调用时解析。这是已接受的残余：在 bash-equivalent 信任模型下，这里的重绑只会伤害模型自身的运行，且判决仍必达宿主——`send_done` 的固定兜底帧即使在错误路径编码/写入抛出时也能送达一帧 done。
+- **编码器的直接依赖在调用时解析。** `_encode_json_plain` 通过模块全局查找到达 `_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json`，因此以 `__main__` 运行的程序在返回合法值后重绑这些名字之一（例如 `__main__._dump_scalar = boom`）可以让编码抛出、把成功降级为 `exception`。值路径的入口名（`_done_with_value`）被绑定进 `_run` 局部、其顶层的 `_check_done_value`/`_encode_json_plain` 是 def 期默认值，但编码器的传递依赖（例如 `_dump_scalar`/`_dump_string`/`json`/`io`——非穷举清单）仍在调用时解析。这是已接受的残余：在 bash-equivalent 信任模型下，这里的重绑只会伤害模型自身的运行，且判决仍必达宿主——`send_done` 的固定兜底帧即使在错误路径编码/写入抛出时也能送达一帧 done。
 - **宽 binding 回复会按成员展开宿主侧状态。** 回复经由 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session`](../../core/session/README.zh.md) 的 `snapshotJsonValue` 穿越，其 `walkJsonValue` 为每个成员压入一个任务帧，而 binding 回复在 seam 层没有字节上限。因此一个数百万元素的合法回复可以耗尽宿主堆。该性质属于那个共享遍历，而不属于本后端——worker-thread 后端消费同一个函数——所以修复应落在 `packages/core/session`，让所有消费方一并受益。
 - **程序用同步的 `t.join()` 连接一个跨线程 binding 会死锁。** 这是 `process` 隔离后端特有的：回复泵运行在子进程的主事件循环上，因此当程序的主协程对一个仍在等待 binding 回复的 worker 线程调用 `t.join()` 时，join 会阻塞承载泵的主线程事件循环——正是泵投递该回复所需的循环——该 worker 的 `await` 直到墙钟才会恢复。worker-thread 后端不共享此结构，所以修复应落在这里，而非 `packages/core/session`。