Chinesezjc
2e3cf144d5
Adding a published Python backend and reordering `flush_line` left several owning documents stating things that are no longer true. `src/invariant.ts` justified its empty installer with "ships only the fd-3 wire-protocol codec", which the subprocess execution path contradicts. The reason now states the actual one: every relation this backend maintains lives in the CPython child or on the fd-3 wire, so no same-process event sequence is observable from a listener -- the same shape the sibling worker-thread backend uses. The seam's `PORTABLE_RESERVED_WORDS` and `language` JSDoc, the code-runtime README pair, and docs/subsystems/code-runtime both said only TypeScript has a published backend. Corrected in all four, with the generated cordis catalog regenerated for the `language` change. The note attributed the 12x multiple to the settlement flush holding three copies. That stopped being true when `flush_line` was reordered to drop the pending chunks before its push: the binding worst case is the newline path's single near-budget write. Corrected in the note (both sides) and in the test comment that repeated it. The note's Testing section now registers the cases this stack added, and the Chinese side receives the O(depth) entry it never got plus the new ones -- it had drifted from the English. `INTERPRETER_BASELINE_BYTES` argued 64 MiB from a RESIDENT set while RLIMIT_AS bounds address space. It now cites the bootstrap's own measurement (30.23 MiB of mappings for `python3 -I`), making 64 MiB roughly twice the measured baseline. Also: a hardcoded `(:232-235)` comment reference becomes a reference by name, a "which now walks in O(depth) too" change narrative becomes a current-state statement, and a stray double blank line is removed.
description, kind
| description | kind |
|---|---|
| Package map for the code-execution capability family: what program execution does for you, and which package owns each part. | package-group |
code-runtime/ — code-execution capability family
English | 中文
Summary
The code-runtime/ group provides program execution: a model writes one program that calls host-provided functions as ordinary async calls, and a runtime executes it in isolation and returns only what the program printed and returned. One package defines the shared capability (ctx.codeRuntime), a second executes TypeScript programs in a fresh Node worker thread, and a third owns the wire protocol between a Node host and a CPython subprocess for the Python backend. Every run is independent — no state carries from one program to the next — and failures come back as part of the result, so the caller can see why a program failed and feed that back to the model.
Table of Contents
Packages
These three packages together provide program execution; each README describes what its part does.
| Package | Role | ctx key |
|---|---|---|
code-runtime/ |
Defines what a code runtime does: run one program against host-provided bindings and report what it printed and returned | ctx.codeRuntime |
code-runtime-worker-thread/ |
Executes TypeScript programs, each in a fresh Node worker thread | registers ctx.codeRuntime |
code-runtime-python/ |
Owns the fd-3 wire protocol between a Node host and a CPython subprocess, the Python backend's protocol layer | — |
Related documentation
Start with the subsystem reference for the service contract, then the PTC mode design that consumes this capability and the capability-seam model it follows.
- Code runtime subsystem reference — request/result vocabulary, bindings, and the
ctx.codeRuntimecordis surface. - PTC mode Agent Note — how the tool registry presents
run_codeto the model. - Capability seams — the Service Definition / Service Provider / Consumer split this family follows.
Dev Note
Working context for maintainers — click to expand
None.