mirror of
https://github.com/semantica-agi/semantica.git
synced 2026-08-29 04:26:20 +00:00
docs: Add comprehensive open source project improvements
- Add essential open source files (CONTRIBUTING.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, SECURITY.md, CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTORS.md) - Add GitHub issue and PR templates - Add CI/CD workflows (CI, docs, release, dependabot) - Add pre-commit hooks configuration - Add documentation enhancements (architecture, governance, contributing, community) - Add developer experience scripts (setup-dev, run-tests, format-code, check-code) - Add community features (SUPPORT.md, .all-contributorsrc) - Enhance README badges and project metadata - Update mkdocs.yml navigation structure
This commit is contained in:
KaifAhmad1
@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
|
||||
# Governance
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the governance model for the Semantica project.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Semantica is an open-source project maintained by Hawksight AI with community contributions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Roles
|
||||
|
||||
#### Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
Maintainers are responsible for:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reviewing and merging pull requests
|
||||
- Managing releases
|
||||
- Maintaining code quality
|
||||
- Resolving conflicts
|
||||
- Community management
|
||||
- Project direction
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Maintainers**:
|
||||
- Hawksight AI team
|
||||
|
||||
#### Contributors
|
||||
|
||||
Contributors are community members who:
|
||||
|
||||
- Submit code contributions
|
||||
- Improve documentation
|
||||
- Report bugs
|
||||
- Suggest features
|
||||
- Help with issues
|
||||
- Review pull requests
|
||||
|
||||
**Recognition**: All contributors are recognized in [CONTRIBUTORS.md](../CONTRIBUTORS.md)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Community Members
|
||||
|
||||
Community members:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use Semantica
|
||||
- Provide feedback
|
||||
- Answer questions
|
||||
- Share use cases
|
||||
- Participate in discussions
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision-Making Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Changes
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Proposal**: Feature requests or bug reports via GitHub Issues
|
||||
2. **Discussion**: Community discussion in Issues or Discussions
|
||||
3. **Implementation**: Contributor creates PR
|
||||
4. **Review**: Maintainers review PR
|
||||
5. **Approval**: At least one maintainer approval required
|
||||
6. **Merge**: PR merged after approval and CI checks pass
|
||||
|
||||
### Major Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
For major decisions (breaking changes, architecture changes, etc.):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **RFC Process**: Request for Comments in GitHub Discussions
|
||||
2. **Community Input**: Open discussion period (minimum 1 week)
|
||||
3. **Decision**: Maintainers make final decision based on:
|
||||
- Community feedback
|
||||
- Technical feasibility
|
||||
- Project goals
|
||||
- Maintenance burden
|
||||
|
||||
### Release Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Planning**: Roadmap planning in GitHub Projects
|
||||
2. **Development**: Feature development in feature branches
|
||||
3. **Testing**: Comprehensive testing and CI checks
|
||||
4. **Release Candidate**: RC for major releases
|
||||
5. **Release**: Tagged release with changelog
|
||||
6. **Documentation**: Updated documentation
|
||||
|
||||
## Release Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Versioning
|
||||
|
||||
We follow [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/):
|
||||
|
||||
- **MAJOR**: Breaking changes
|
||||
- **MINOR**: New features (backward compatible)
|
||||
- **PATCH**: Bug fixes (backward compatible)
|
||||
|
||||
### Release Schedule
|
||||
|
||||
- **Major Releases**: Quarterly or as needed
|
||||
- **Minor Releases**: Monthly or as features are ready
|
||||
- **Patch Releases**: As bugs are fixed
|
||||
|
||||
### Release Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All tests pass
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation updated
|
||||
- [ ] Changelog updated
|
||||
- [ ] Version bumped
|
||||
- [ ] Release notes prepared
|
||||
- [ ] Tagged release created
|
||||
- [ ] Announcement posted
|
||||
|
||||
## Roadmap Planning
|
||||
|
||||
### Planning Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Community Input**: Gather feature requests and feedback
|
||||
2. **Prioritization**: Maintainers prioritize based on:
|
||||
- Community demand
|
||||
- Technical feasibility
|
||||
- Project goals
|
||||
- Resource availability
|
||||
3. **Roadmap Publication**: Roadmap published in README and docs
|
||||
4. **Regular Updates**: Roadmap updated quarterly
|
||||
|
||||
### Roadmap Categories
|
||||
|
||||
- **Short-term** (1-3 months): Current sprint
|
||||
- **Medium-term** (3-6 months): Next quarter
|
||||
- **Long-term** (6+ months): Future vision
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Review Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
PRs are reviewed for:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Functionality**: Does it work as intended?
|
||||
- **Code Quality**: Follows style guidelines?
|
||||
- **Tests**: Adequate test coverage?
|
||||
- **Documentation**: Documentation updated?
|
||||
- **Performance**: No performance regressions?
|
||||
- **Security**: No security issues?
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- **Initial Review**: Within 48 hours
|
||||
- **Follow-up**: Within 7 days
|
||||
- **Resolution**: Depends on complexity
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
**For Reviewers**:
|
||||
- Be constructive and respectful
|
||||
- Explain reasoning for suggestions
|
||||
- Approve when criteria are met
|
||||
- Request changes when needed
|
||||
|
||||
**For Contributors**:
|
||||
- Address all review comments
|
||||
- Ask questions if unclear
|
||||
- Be open to feedback
|
||||
- Update PR based on feedback
|
||||
|
||||
## Conflict Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
- Technical disagreements: Discuss in PR comments
|
||||
- Unresolved: Escalate to maintainers
|
||||
- Final decision: Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
### Community Conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
- Follow [Code of Conduct](../CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
|
||||
- Report violations to maintainers
|
||||
- Maintainers handle enforcement
|
||||
|
||||
## Communication Channels
|
||||
|
||||
### GitHub
|
||||
|
||||
- **Issues**: Bug reports and feature requests
|
||||
- **Discussions**: Questions and general discussion
|
||||
- **Pull Requests**: Code contributions
|
||||
- **Releases**: Release announcements
|
||||
|
||||
### Discord
|
||||
|
||||
- Real-time community chat
|
||||
- Quick questions
|
||||
- Community support
|
||||
- Showcases
|
||||
|
||||
### Email
|
||||
|
||||
- Security issues: semantica-dev@users.noreply.github.com
|
||||
- General inquiries: GitHub Discussions preferred
|
||||
|
||||
## Contribution Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
See [CONTRIBUTING.md](../CONTRIBUTING.md) for detailed contribution guidelines.
|
||||
|
||||
### Types of Contributions
|
||||
|
||||
- Code contributions
|
||||
- Documentation improvements
|
||||
- Bug reports
|
||||
- Feature suggestions
|
||||
- Code reviews
|
||||
- Community support
|
||||
|
||||
### Recognition
|
||||
|
||||
All contributors are recognized in:
|
||||
- [CONTRIBUTORS.md](../CONTRIBUTORS.md)
|
||||
- GitHub contributors page
|
||||
- Release notes for significant contributions
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Goals
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Goals
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Usability**: Easy to use and understand
|
||||
2. **Reliability**: Production-ready quality
|
||||
3. **Performance**: Efficient and scalable
|
||||
4. **Extensibility**: Easy to extend and customize
|
||||
5. **Community**: Welcoming and inclusive
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- Contributor engagement
|
||||
- Issue resolution time
|
||||
- Code quality metrics
|
||||
- Community growth
|
||||
- User satisfaction
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
Semantica is licensed under the MIT License. See [LICENSE](../LICENSE) for details.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contact
|
||||
|
||||
For governance questions or concerns:
|
||||
|
||||
- **GitHub Discussions**: General questions
|
||||
- **Email**: semantica-dev@users.noreply.github.com
|
||||
- **Discord**: Community chat
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Last Updated**: 2024-01-XX
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user