Files
semantica/tests/ontology
江俊杰 08a6e7c053 fix(ontology): render real SHACL constraint values in explain_violations
explain_violations previously rendered hardcoded placeholders (min_count=1,
max_count=1) and misused the violation message as the datatype/class value,
so plain-English explanations were inaccurate. The root cause is that
_run_pyshacl never read the real constraint parameters from sh:sourceShape
when building each SHACLViolation.

Changes:
- SHACLViolation: add min_count/max_count/datatype/class_ fields and include
  them in to_dict()
- _run_pyshacl: back-reference sh:sourceShape to extract the real
  sh:minCount/sh:maxCount/sh:datatype/sh:class values
- explain_violations: render the real values, falling back to "?" or
  descriptive text when unknown

Note: sh:qualifiedMinCount/qualifiedMaxCount are not handled and fall back to
the "?" placeholder.

Adds regression tests covering both the formatting path and the sh:sourceShape
back-reference (skips when pyshacl/rdflib are absent).
2026-08-19 16:30:36 +08:00
..