* docs: replace Exported Classes import blocks with summary tables across all 25 modules * docs: add method/parameter tables to parse, ingest, ontology, normalize, triplet_store, change_management, conflicts, export, graph_store, provenance, and semantic_extract modules
8.9 KiB
title, description, icon
| title | description | icon |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning Module | Forward chaining, Rete, deductive, abductive, SPARQL, Datalog, and temporal reasoning with explainable inference paths. | microchip |
semantica.reasoning derives new knowledge from existing facts using logical rules. Every engine produces explainable inference paths — traceable chains of rules and facts, not black-box conclusions.
Exported Classes
| Class | Role |
|---|---|
Reasoner |
IF/THEN forward-chaining facade with variable substitution |
GraphReasoner |
Inference over full KG structure (transitivity, symmetry, inverses, property chains) |
ReteEngine |
High-performance Rete pattern matching for large rule sets |
SPARQLReasoner |
Query expansion and property chain inference over RDF graphs |
DatalogReasoner |
Recursive Horn clause rules with guaranteed fixpoint termination |
TemporalReasoningEngine |
All 13 Allen interval algebra relations for time-aware inference |
ExplanationGenerator |
Structured step-by-step explanations with confidence and reasoning path |
Rule |
IF/THEN rule definition: {conditions, actions, confidence, rule_type} |
InferenceResult |
Result of infer() — contains derived_facts and metadata |
Quick Start
The most common pattern: add facts + rules, run inference, explain a conclusion:
from semantica.reasoning import Reasoner, Rule, Fact, RuleType, InferenceResult
reasoner = Reasoner()
reasoner.add_fact(Fact(subject="Alice", predicate="is_a", obj="Manager"))
reasoner.add_rule(Rule(
rule_type=RuleType.FORWARD_CHAIN,
conditions=[{"subject": "?x", "predicate": "is_a", "object": "Manager"}],
conclusion={"subject": "?x", "predicate": "has_authority", "object": "true"},
))
result: InferenceResult = reasoner.infer()
for fact in result.derived_facts:
print(f"{fact.subject} {fact.predicate} {fact.obj}")
print(f" via: {fact.explanation}")
<img src="/assets/img/diagrams/reasoning-chain.svg" alt="Forward chaining inference: known facts + IF/THEN rules produce derived facts with a full traceable explanation path" style={{ width: '100%', borderRadius: '12px', margin: '0 0 24px' }} />
Reasoner (Main Facade)
The unified entry point for rule-based forward-chaining inference:
from semantica.reasoning import Reasoner, Rule, Fact, RuleType
reasoner = Reasoner()
# Add base facts
reasoner.add_fact(Fact(subject="John", predicate="is_a", obj="Manager"))
reasoner.add_fact(Fact(subject="John", predicate="is_a", obj="Employee"))
# Add an IF/THEN rule
reasoner.add_rule(Rule(
rule_type=RuleType.FORWARD_CHAIN,
conditions=[
{"subject": "?x", "predicate": "is_a", "object": "Manager"}
],
conclusion={"subject": "?x", "predicate": "has_authority", "object": "true"}
))
# Run inference
result = reasoner.infer()
for inference in result.derived_facts:
print(f"{inference.subject} {inference.predicate} {inference.obj}")
print(f" Derived via: {inference.explanation}")
Built-In Rule Templates
engine = Reasoner()
# Transitive closure: A→B, B→C ⟹ A→C
engine.apply_transitivity("located_in")
# Symmetry: A knows B ⟹ B knows A
engine.apply_symmetry("knows")
# Inverse: A parent_of B ⟹ B child_of A
engine.apply_inverse("parent_of", "child_of")
GraphReasoner
Inference over the full knowledge graph structure:
from semantica.reasoning import GraphReasoner
graph_reasoner = GraphReasoner(kg)
# Define a transitive ancestor rule
graph_reasoner.add_rule({
"if": [
{"subject": "?a", "predicate": "parent_of", "object": "?b"},
{"subject": "?b", "predicate": "parent_of", "object": "?c"}
],
"then": {"subject": "?a", "predicate": "ancestor_of", "object": "?c"}
})
inferences = graph_reasoner.infer(kg)
for inf in inferences:
print(f"{inf['subject']} {inf['predicate']} {inf['object']}")
ReteEngine
High-performance pattern matching using the Rete algorithm — far faster than naive forward chaining for large rule sets because it caches partial matches across iterations:
from semantica.reasoning import ReteEngine
engine = ReteEngine()
engine.load_rules("rules/domain_rules.json")
results = engine.run(kg)
# Inspect the Rete network
root = engine.get_root()
alpha_nodes = engine.get_alpha_nodes() # single-condition filters
beta_nodes = engine.get_beta_nodes() # join nodes
Rule format (JSON):
{
"rules": [
{
"name": "manager_authority",
"conditions": [
{ "subject": "?x", "predicate": "role", "object": "Manager" }
],
"action": { "subject": "?x", "predicate": "has_authority", "object": "true" }
}
]
}
SPARQLReasoner
Query-based inference over RDF graphs with property chain support:
from semantica.reasoning import SPARQLReasoner
reasoner = SPARQLReasoner(graph=rdf_graph)
result = reasoner.query("""
PREFIX ex: <http://example.org/>
SELECT ?person ?company WHERE {
?person ex:founded ?company .
?company ex:located_in ex:SiliconValley .
}
""")
for row in result.bindings:
print(row["person"], row["company"])
# Property chain inference: A knows B, B colleague_of C ⟹ A knows C
reasoner.add_property_chain("knows", ["knows", "colleague_of"])
inferences = reasoner.infer_property_chains()
DatalogReasoner (v0.4.0)
Pure-Python bottom-up semi-naive fixpoint evaluation for recursive Horn clause rules. Termination is guaranteed — the engine detects fixpoint convergence and stops:
from semantica.reasoning import DatalogReasoner, DatalogFact, DatalogRule
datalog = DatalogReasoner()
# Base facts
datalog.add_fact(DatalogFact("parent", ("alice", "bob")))
datalog.add_fact(DatalogFact("parent", ("bob", "charlie")))
# Recursive rules (Horn clauses)
datalog.add_rule(DatalogRule("ancestor(?X, ?Y) :- parent(?X, ?Y)."))
datalog.add_rule(DatalogRule("ancestor(?X, ?Z) :- parent(?X, ?Y), ancestor(?Y, ?Z)."))
# Evaluate to fixpoint
datalog.evaluate()
# Query
results = datalog.query("ancestor(alice, ?Z)")
# → [{"Z": "bob"}, {"Z": "charlie"}]
TemporalReasoningEngine
Reason about time intervals using all 13 Allen interval algebra relations:
from semantica.reasoning import TemporalReasoningEngine, TemporalInterval, IntervalRelation
engine = TemporalReasoningEngine()
ceo_tenure = TemporalInterval(start="1997-09-16", end="2011-08-24")
board_member = TemporalInterval(start="2000-01-01", end="2012-06-01")
relation = engine.get_relation(ceo_tenure, board_member)
# → IntervalRelation.DURING (ceo_tenure is fully inside board_member)
All 13 Allen interval algebra relations are supported:
| Relation | Meaning |
|---|---|
BEFORE |
A ends before B starts |
MEETS |
A ends exactly when B starts |
OVERLAPS |
A starts before B, ends inside B |
DURING |
A is fully inside B |
STARTS |
A and B start together, A ends first |
FINISHES |
A and B end together, A starts later |
EQUALS |
Identical intervals |
| + 6 inverses | AFTER, MET_BY, OVERLAPPED_BY, CONTAINS, STARTED_BY, FINISHED_BY |
ExplanationGenerator
Generate structured step-by-step explanations for any derived conclusion:
from semantica.reasoning import ExplanationGenerator, Explanation, ReasoningStep
generator = ExplanationGenerator(reasoner)
explanation: Explanation = generator.explain(
conclusion={"subject": "John", "predicate": "has_authority", "object": "true"}
)
print(f"Conclusion: {explanation.conclusion}")
print(f"Confidence: {explanation.confidence:.2f}")
step: ReasoningStep
for step in explanation.reasoning_path.steps:
print(f" Step {step.depth}: {step.fact}")
print(f" via rule: '{step.rule_name}'")
Choosing an Engine
| Engine | Best For | Termination | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
Reasoner |
Simple IF/THEN rules, templates | Always | Low |
GraphReasoner |
KG-wide structural inference | Always | Medium |
ReteEngine |
Large rule sets (100+ rules) | Always | Low per-match |
SPARQLReasoner |
RDF graphs with SPARQL endpoint | Always | Low |
DatalogReasoner |
Recursive rules (ancestry, reachability) | Guaranteed fixpoint | Medium |
TemporalReasoningEngine |
Time interval relationships | Always | Low |