Files
semantica/docs
KaifAhmad1 aa2cd00f07 docs: fix inverted pitfall wording and broken required_* pattern in mortgage example
- Correct the unsupported-rule-key pitfall: absent keys fail compliance,
  present keys (any value) pass — the previous wording had this backwards.
- Remove required_ltv/pd/lgd/dsti/credit_score: True from the mortgage
  example. required_* checks equality against the given value, so True
  against a real numeric field silently marks compliant decisions as
  non-compliant (verified: a fully passing decision still returned False).
  The min_/max_ rules already enforce presence of ltv/dsti/credit_score.
2026-07-05 13:24:22 +05:30
..
2026-06-17 13:26:19 +05:30