docs(code-runtime-python): sync the Consequences enumeration to eleven no-fail-before fixes

The review's item: the Problem section counts eleven no-fail-before fixes, but
the Consequences section still said 'the ten called out in the Problem section'
(zh: '那十处') and omitted the new unknown-binding preview cap. Both sides now
say eleven and name the cap, paired and re-recorded.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md
-2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md: a5a5190497c6852df17af59ceedfd036089719d2
-2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md: 25d70c4ed419d941ab2a577a545f1030ee18004f
+2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md: f98d9f4a21c8a50f7e978826d7788f6aa69baf70
+2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md: 4a1aa138aaedfb6302b4c9108b1834dcfedcadc9

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md

@@ -140,4 +140,4 @@ In [`py/bootstrap.py`](../../../../packages/code-runtime/code-runtime-python/py/
 
 ## Consequences
 
-The seam's resolve-don't-reject contract holds on the boot-write path and the synchronous-spawn-failure path, both with measured coverage, and neither strands a staging directory. Log capture is thread-safe at the cost of one re-entrant lock acquisition per write and flush, and stray native output is delimited by its own newlines rather than by transport chunks. Fd-3 residual memory is bounded by the actual retained bytes, and both frame readers scan an accumulating frame once rather than quadratically. The output caps admit every value a frame can carry and reject a non-integer budget at load. Disposal is genuinely quiescent against a same-group survivor — bounded by `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS`, zero-cost when the group is already empty, with the SIGKILL timer cleared once the group empties so a stale kill cannot strike a recycled pgid — RLIMIT enforcement keeps the strictest of configured and inherited on both soft and hard (and the SIGXCPU diagnostic no longer names a budget the host cannot guarantee), bindings called from model-created threads complete instead of timing out, and the handshake frame reader no longer burns the CPU budget on a large program. Every behavioral fix carries a test that fails without it, except the ten called out in the Problem section — the chunked frame read (a syscall-count improvement), the confirmed-empty finalize (whose only seam-observable effect freezes at signal delivery, which the pre-fix code also produced), the shared stdout/stderr budget (whose only seam-observable difference turns on nondeterministic cross-pipe arrival timing), the `flush_line` reorder (whose lowered peak stays within what the 12x gate already admits, so no config behaves differently), pacing binding replies (the 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB peak reduction lives inside the host's fd-3 writable buffer, unmeasurable through the seam), dropping a late binding resolution before snapshot (its three assertions all hold pre-fix, so it is not a fail-before case), the done-value TOCTOU pre-encoding (its concurrent-mutation race is not deterministically constructible through the seam, and the daemon-mutation regression's only assertion is probabilistic), the stray-UTF-8 budget-flush retention (a budget flush landing on a multibyte boundary is not schedulable through the seam — v8-ignored), and the late-rejection settled guard (a rejection arriving after settlement is not deterministically constructible from the seam), and the log-fragment seal (its 25 M-scale OOM is not deterministically constructible in CI) — so a future regression on the rest goes red.
+The seam's resolve-don't-reject contract holds on the boot-write path and the synchronous-spawn-failure path, both with measured coverage, and neither strands a staging directory. Log capture is thread-safe at the cost of one re-entrant lock acquisition per write and flush, and stray native output is delimited by its own newlines rather than by transport chunks. Fd-3 residual memory is bounded by the actual retained bytes, and both frame readers scan an accumulating frame once rather than quadratically. The output caps admit every value a frame can carry and reject a non-integer budget at load. Disposal is genuinely quiescent against a same-group survivor — bounded by `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS`, zero-cost when the group is already empty, with the SIGKILL timer cleared once the group empties so a stale kill cannot strike a recycled pgid — RLIMIT enforcement keeps the strictest of configured and inherited on both soft and hard (and the SIGXCPU diagnostic no longer names a budget the host cannot guarantee), bindings called from model-created threads complete instead of timing out, and the handshake frame reader no longer burns the CPU budget on a large program. Every behavioral fix carries a test that fails without it, except the eleven called out in the Problem section — the chunked frame read (a syscall-count improvement), the confirmed-empty finalize (whose only seam-observable effect freezes at signal delivery, which the pre-fix code also produced), the shared stdout/stderr budget (whose only seam-observable difference turns on nondeterministic cross-pipe arrival timing), the `flush_line` reorder (whose lowered peak stays within what the 12x gate already admits, so no config behaves differently), pacing binding replies (the 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB peak reduction lives inside the host's fd-3 writable buffer, unmeasurable through the seam), dropping a late binding resolution before snapshot (its three assertions all hold pre-fix, so it is not a fail-before case), the done-value TOCTOU pre-encoding (its concurrent-mutation race is not deterministically constructible through the seam, and the daemon-mutation regression's only assertion is probabilistic), the stray-UTF-8 budget-flush retention (a budget flush landing on a multibyte boundary is not schedulable through the seam — v8-ignored), and the late-rejection settled guard (a rejection arriving after settlement is not deterministically constructible from the seam), and the log-fragment seal (its 25 M-scale OOM is not deterministically constructible in CI), and the unknown-binding preview cap (its whole-target `JSON.stringify` peak is a transient allocation inside the reply path, unmeasurable through the seam) — so a future regression on the rest goes red.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md

@@ -140,4 +140,4 @@ unknown-binding 回复用 `JSON.stringify` 对完整的限幅 target（`global`
 
 ## Consequences
 
-seam 的"只 resolve、不 reject"契约在引导写入路径和同步 spawn 失败路径上都得以成立，两者的覆盖率都是被度量的，且两者都不会遗留一个暂存目录。日志捕获是线程安全的，代价是每次写入和 flush 都要获取一次可重入锁，并且散逸的原生输出由它自己的换行符来分隔，而不是由传输分片来分隔。fd-3 残余数据的内存受实际保留的字节数约束，并且两个帧读取器都以一次而非平方级的方式扫描一个不断累积的帧。输出上限放行一个帧所能承载的每一个值，并在加载期拒绝一个非整数的预算。dispose 面对同进程组存活者是真正完全停稳的（以 `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS` 为界，在进程组已为空时代价为零，并且一旦进程组清空就清除 SIGKILL 定时器，从而一次滞留的 kill 无法击中一个被回收的 pgid），RLIMIT 强制在 soft 和 hard 两者上都保持配置值与继承值中的最严格者（并且 SIGXCPU 诊断不再把一个宿主无法保证的预算说出来），并且从模型创建的线程调用的绑定会完成而不是超时，而且握手帧读取器不再在一个大程序上烧掉 CPU 预算。每处行为修复都附带一个在缺少它时会失败的测试，除了 Problem 一节点出的那十处——分块读取帧（一处系统调用次数的改进）、确认为空后的收尾（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的效应会在信号投递时冻结，而修复前的代码也会产生同样的结果）、共享的 stdout／stderr 预算（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的差异取决于不确定的跨管道到达时机），`flush_line` 重排序（它降低后的峰值仍落在 12× 门本就放行的范围内，因此没有配置会有不同表现）、节流 binding 回复（32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB 的峰值降幅位于宿主 fd-3 可写缓冲内部、透过 seam 不可度量），在快照之前丢弃迟到的 binding 解析（它的三条断言在修复前同样成立，因此不是一处缺代码即变红的用例），完成值的 TOCTOU 预编码（它的并发变异竞态无法透过 seam 确定性构造，而 daemon 变异回归的唯一断言是概率性的），stray UTF-8 预算冲刷的扣留（落在多字节边界上的预算冲刷无法透过 seam 调度——v8-ignored），以及结算后到达的迟到拒绝的 settled 先查（结算之后才到达的拒绝无法从 seam 确定性构造），以及日志分片封存（其 25 M 规模的 OOM 无法在 CI 中确定性构造）——因此其余各处未来若发生回归都会变红。
+seam 的"只 resolve、不 reject"契约在引导写入路径和同步 spawn 失败路径上都得以成立，两者的覆盖率都是被度量的，且两者都不会遗留一个暂存目录。日志捕获是线程安全的，代价是每次写入和 flush 都要获取一次可重入锁，并且散逸的原生输出由它自己的换行符来分隔，而不是由传输分片来分隔。fd-3 残余数据的内存受实际保留的字节数约束，并且两个帧读取器都以一次而非平方级的方式扫描一个不断累积的帧。输出上限放行一个帧所能承载的每一个值，并在加载期拒绝一个非整数的预算。dispose 面对同进程组存活者是真正完全停稳的（以 `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS` 为界，在进程组已为空时代价为零，并且一旦进程组清空就清除 SIGKILL 定时器，从而一次滞留的 kill 无法击中一个被回收的 pgid），RLIMIT 强制在 soft 和 hard 两者上都保持配置值与继承值中的最严格者（并且 SIGXCPU 诊断不再把一个宿主无法保证的预算说出来），并且从模型创建的线程调用的绑定会完成而不是超时，而且握手帧读取器不再在一个大程序上烧掉 CPU 预算。每处行为修复都附带一个在缺少它时会失败的测试，除了 Problem 一节点出的那十一处——分块读取帧（一处系统调用次数的改进）、确认为空后的收尾（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的效应会在信号投递时冻结，而修复前的代码也会产生同样的结果）、共享的 stdout／stderr 预算（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的差异取决于不确定的跨管道到达时机），`flush_line` 重排序（它降低后的峰值仍落在 12× 门本就放行的范围内，因此没有配置会有不同表现）、节流 binding 回复（32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB 的峰值降幅位于宿主 fd-3 可写缓冲内部、透过 seam 不可度量），在快照之前丢弃迟到的 binding 解析（它的三条断言在修复前同样成立，因此不是一处缺代码即变红的用例），完成值的 TOCTOU 预编码（它的并发变异竞态无法透过 seam 确定性构造，而 daemon 变异回归的唯一断言是概率性的），stray UTF-8 预算冲刷的扣留（落在多字节边界上的预算冲刷无法透过 seam 调度——v8-ignored），以及结算后到达的迟到拒绝的 settled 先查（结算之后才到达的拒绝无法从 seam 确定性构造），以及日志分片封存（其 25 M 规模的 OOM 无法在 CI 中确定性构造），以及 unknown-binding 预览上限（其完整 target 的 `JSON.stringify` 峰值是回复路径内的一次瞬时分配，无法透过 seam 度量）——因此其余各处未来若发生回归都会变红。