mirror of
https://github.com/semantica-agi/semantica.git
synced 2026-08-29 04:26:20 +00:00
622 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
622 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Visualization"
|
|
description: "Render knowledge graphs, ontology hierarchies, embedding projections, graph analytics, and temporal timelines as interactive HTML or static image files."
|
|
icon: "chart-network"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
`KGVisualizer`, `AnalyticsVisualizer`, `TemporalVisualizer`, and `OntologyVisualizer` turn graph dicts, analytics results, and ontologies into interactive HTML dashboards or static images in a single method call. Use them to present centrality rankings, community clusters, event timelines, and before/after snapshot diffs to stakeholders without writing any rendering code.
|
|
|
|
## What Is Visualization?
|
|
|
|
Visualization converts graph data into interactive charts, network diagrams, timelines, and other visual formats that humans can interpret. It transforms abstract graph structures and analytical results into visual representations that reveal patterns, relationships, and insights.
|
|
|
|
**Visualization vs. analytics:** Analytics computes numerical measures like centrality scores and community memberships. Visualization renders those measures as colored nodes, sized by importance, grouped by community.
|
|
|
|
**Visualization vs. reasoning:** Reasoning derives new logical facts from existing data. Visualization presents existing facts and analytical results in visual form to support human interpretation and decision-making.
|
|
|
|
Visualization helps humans understand graph structure, analytical results, and temporal patterns that would be difficult to interpret from raw data alone.
|
|
|
|
## Why Use Visualization?
|
|
|
|
**Visual exploration:** Interactive graphs let you pan, zoom, hover, and filter to explore large networks that would be overwhelming as text or tables.
|
|
|
|
**Investigation support:** Highlighting paths between entities, color-coding by entity type, and sizing nodes by importance helps analysts identify patterns and focus investigation efforts.
|
|
|
|
**Communication:** Visual presentations make complex graph relationships accessible to stakeholders who don't work directly with the data.
|
|
|
|
**Reporting:** Static visualizations provide evidence and support for written reports, presentations, and regulatory submissions.
|
|
|
|
## When To Use / When Not To Use
|
|
|
|
**Visualization is appropriate for:**
|
|
- Presenting graph structure and analytical results to humans
|
|
- Exploring relationships and patterns in medium-sized graphs (10-1000 nodes)
|
|
- Creating reports and presentations for stakeholders
|
|
- Investigating specific paths or neighborhoods within graphs
|
|
- Communicating findings from analytics or reasoning workflows
|
|
|
|
**Graph traversal may be enough for:**
|
|
- Programmatic exploration of relationships
|
|
- Simple queries about specific paths or connections
|
|
- Automated workflows that don't require human interpretation
|
|
|
|
**Analytics may be more useful for:**
|
|
- Computing numerical measures and rankings
|
|
- Finding communities or centrality scores programmatically
|
|
- Quantitative comparisons that don't need visualization
|
|
|
|
**Reasoning may be more useful for:**
|
|
- Deriving new facts through logical inference
|
|
- Rule-based decision making
|
|
- Automated policy enforcement
|
|
|
|
**Visualization becomes impractical when:**
|
|
- Graphs exceed ~1000 nodes (browser performance degrades)
|
|
- The network is too dense to interpret visually
|
|
- You need programmatic analysis rather than human interpretation
|
|
|
|
## Typical Visualization Workflow
|
|
|
|
**Graph → Filter → Visualize → Interpret → Investigate**
|
|
|
|
Most effective visualization follows this pattern:
|
|
1. **Start with your knowledge graph** from `ContextGraph` or analytics results
|
|
2. **Filter to a meaningful subgraph** — avoid visualizing entire enterprise graphs
|
|
3. **Choose appropriate visualization** — network, timeline, heatmap, or rankings
|
|
4. **Interpret the visual patterns** — clusters, central nodes, temporal trends
|
|
5. **Investigate interesting findings** — drill down on unexpected patterns or outliers
|
|
|
|
Always filter before visualizing. A 10,000-node enterprise graph becomes meaningful when filtered to the 50 most central nodes or the subgraph around a specific entity of interest.
|
|
|
|
<Info>
|
|
**Performance Warning:** Large graphs (>1000 nodes) cause browser performance issues and become visually overwhelming. Interactive network visualizations work best with 10-1000 nodes. For larger graphs, use analytics to identify the most important subgraphs, then visualize those filtered results.
|
|
</Info>
|
|
|
|
<Info>
|
|
All visualizers accept `output="interactive"` (Plotly/pyvis HTML, shown in Jupyter or saved to file) or `output="static"` (PNG/SVG via Matplotlib). Omit `file_path` to get the figure object back for further manipulation.
|
|
</Info>
|
|
|
|
## Rendering the Full Knowledge Graph
|
|
|
|
The first thing to put in front of stakeholders is the full network — nodes coloured by entity type, sized by degree centrality, with tooltips showing content on hover.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.context import AgentContext, ContextGraph
|
|
from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore
|
|
from semantica.visualization import KGVisualizer
|
|
|
|
graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
|
|
ctx = AgentContext(
|
|
vector_store=VectorStore(backend="faiss", dimension=768),
|
|
knowledge_graph=graph,
|
|
graph_expansion=True,
|
|
)
|
|
ctx.store([
|
|
"APT29 exploited CVE-2024-3400 targeting NATO defense contractors.",
|
|
"CVE-2024-3400 is a critical vulnerability in PAN-OS by Palo Alto Networks.",
|
|
"HAMMERTOSS is APT29's C2 backdoor operating over Twitter and GitHub.",
|
|
"APT29 conducted the SUNBURST supply chain attack against SolarWinds in 2020.",
|
|
], extract_entities=True, extract_relationships=True)
|
|
|
|
viz = KGVisualizer()
|
|
|
|
# Interactive network — saved to HTML, opens in any browser
|
|
viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/threat_graph.html",
|
|
node_color_by = "type", # colour each node by its entity type
|
|
node_size_by = "degree", # larger nodes = more connections
|
|
hover_data = ["type", "content"],
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The resulting HTML is fully self-contained — no server required. Share it as a file attachment and it renders in any browser with pan, zoom, and hover.
|
|
|
|
For a static PNG suitable for a PDF report or a slide deck:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "static",
|
|
file_path = "reports/threat_graph.png",
|
|
node_color_by = "type",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To highlight a specific attribution path through the graph — for example, the chain from APT29 through SUNBURST to SolarWinds — pass the node IDs as `highlight_path`:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "static",
|
|
file_path = "reports/apt29_path.png",
|
|
highlight_path = ["APT29", "SUNBURST", "SolarWinds"],
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Showing Community Structure
|
|
|
|
After community detection, you have a dict mapping community labels to node ID lists. `visualize_communities` on `KGVisualizer` overlays those clusters on the network; `AnalyticsVisualizer.visualize_community_structure` forwards to that same community graph view.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.visualization import AnalyticsVisualizer
|
|
|
|
# The community dict you get from graph analytics
|
|
communities = {
|
|
"node_assignments": {
|
|
"apt29": 0,
|
|
"hammertoss": 0,
|
|
"nobelium": 0,
|
|
"sunburst": 0,
|
|
"cve-2024-3400": 1,
|
|
"pan-os": 1,
|
|
"globalprotect": 1,
|
|
"solarwinds": 2,
|
|
"orion-platform": 2,
|
|
"cve-2020-10148": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
"num_communities": 3,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Network view with community colouring
|
|
viz.visualize_communities(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
communities = communities,
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/communities_network.html",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Standalone breakdown chart — for a slide on "what are the 12 clusters?"
|
|
av = AnalyticsVisualizer()
|
|
av.visualize_community_structure(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
communities = communities,
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/communities_breakdown.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Plotting Centrality Rankings
|
|
|
|
The centrality dict maps node IDs to scores. Two calls cover the two use cases: a network view where node size reflects centrality, and a standalone ranked bar chart for the "top 10 most connected nodes" slide.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
centrality = {
|
|
"centrality": {
|
|
"apt29": 0.14,
|
|
"cve-2024-3400": 0.11,
|
|
"pan-os": 0.07,
|
|
"hammertoss": 0.06,
|
|
"nobelium": 0.05,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Network coloured and sized by centrality score
|
|
viz.visualize_centrality(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
centrality = centrality,
|
|
centrality_type= "pagerank",
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/centrality_network.html",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Standalone ranked bar chart — most impactful nodes at a glance
|
|
av.visualize_centrality_rankings(
|
|
centrality = centrality,
|
|
centrality_type = "pagerank",
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/centrality_rankings.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Analytics Charts: Connectivity and Degree Distribution
|
|
|
|
After running graph analytics, two additional charts complete the picture. The connectivity chart shows how many disconnected components exist and how large each one is. The degree distribution shows the power-law shape of your graph — useful for confirming that your graph is scale-free (a few highly-connected hubs, many leaf nodes).
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# Connectivity — pass the analysis result dict directly
|
|
# Keys the visualizer reads: "is_connected", "num_components", "component_sizes"
|
|
connectivity = {
|
|
"is_connected": False,
|
|
"num_components": 3,
|
|
"component_sizes": [42, 8, 2],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
av.visualize_connectivity(
|
|
connectivity = connectivity,
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/connectivity.html",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Degree distribution — pass the graph dict directly
|
|
av.visualize_degree_distribution(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/degree_distribution.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
<Info>
|
|
`visualize_connectivity` takes the connectivity analysis result dict — not `graph.to_dict()`. The dict must contain `"is_connected"`, `"num_components"`, and `"component_sizes"`. Compute it from your graph analytics output and pass the result.
|
|
</Info>
|
|
|
|
## Drawing a Timeline of Events
|
|
|
|
When the story you are telling is temporal — a CVE lifecycle, an incident timeline, a campaign progression — `TemporalVisualizer.visualize_timeline` turns a list of timestamped events into a scrollable interactive chart.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.visualization import TemporalVisualizer
|
|
|
|
tv = TemporalVisualizer()
|
|
|
|
# Events are passed inside a dict under the "events" key
|
|
tv.visualize_timeline(
|
|
temporal_data = {"events": [
|
|
{"id": "pub", "label": "CVE-2024-3400 published", "timestamp": "2024-03-14T00:00:00"},
|
|
{"id": "exp", "label": "Zero-day exploitation begins", "timestamp": "2024-03-26T00:00:00"},
|
|
{"id": "patch", "label": "PAN-OS hotfix released", "timestamp": "2024-04-14T00:00:00"},
|
|
{"id": "rem", "label": "Contractor remediation confirmed","timestamp": "2024-04-30T00:00:00"},
|
|
]},
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/cve_timeline.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Comparing Two Graph Snapshots Side-by-Side
|
|
|
|
When the question is "what changed between March 14 and April 14?", `visualize_snapshot_comparison` takes two named snapshots from `TemporalVersionManager` and renders a line chart comparing graph metrics (entities, relationships, density) across the provided snapshots.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.change_management import TemporalVersionManager
|
|
|
|
vm = TemporalVersionManager(storage_path="versions.db")
|
|
snap1 = vm.get_version("pre_patch_march_14")
|
|
snap2 = vm.get_version("post_patch_april_14")
|
|
|
|
# Pass snapshots as a dict mapping label → snapshot dict
|
|
tv.visualize_snapshot_comparison(
|
|
snapshots = {
|
|
"pre_patch_march_14": snap1,
|
|
"post_patch_april_14": snap2,
|
|
},
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/snapshot_diff.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Tracking Graph Growth Over Time
|
|
|
|
The final chart for a stakeholder review is the growth curve — how many nodes and edges has the graph accumulated over the past year? `visualize_metrics_evolution` takes a history dict and a parallel timestamps list.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# Build from TemporalVersionManager snapshots
|
|
versions = vm.list_versions()
|
|
versions.sort(key=lambda v: v["timestamp"])
|
|
|
|
timestamps = [v["timestamp"][:10] for v in versions]
|
|
metrics_history = {
|
|
"node_count": [len(v.get("nodes", [])) for v in versions],
|
|
"edge_count": [len(v.get("edges", [])) for v in versions],
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tv.visualize_metrics_evolution(
|
|
metrics_history = metrics_history,
|
|
timestamps = timestamps,
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/graph_growth.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Or populate the history dict directly from known quarterly milestones:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
tv.visualize_metrics_evolution(
|
|
metrics_history = {
|
|
"node_count": [50, 142, 309, 481],
|
|
"edge_count": [88, 387, 821, 1340],
|
|
},
|
|
timestamps = ["2025-01-01", "2025-04-01", "2025-07-01", "2025-10-01"],
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/graph_growth.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Domain Examples
|
|
|
|
<Tabs>
|
|
|
|
<Tab title="Defense — CTI/Threat">
|
|
|
|
A full analyst briefing package: interactive threat network, community breakdown, CVE timeline, and graph growth curve — all generated from a live CTI graph before the morning standup.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.context import AgentContext, ContextGraph
|
|
from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore
|
|
from semantica.visualization import KGVisualizer, AnalyticsVisualizer, TemporalVisualizer
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
|
|
ctx = AgentContext(
|
|
vector_store=VectorStore(backend="faiss", dimension=768),
|
|
knowledge_graph=graph,
|
|
graph_expansion=True,
|
|
)
|
|
ctx.store([
|
|
"APT29 used HAMMERTOSS for C2 via Twitter and GitHub in 2020.",
|
|
"APT29 infrastructure cluster: 185.220.101.0/24, AS200651.",
|
|
"SolarWinds supply chain compromise attributed to APT29, campaign SUNBURST.",
|
|
"APT29 leveraged OAuth token theft against cloud workloads in 2023.",
|
|
], extract_entities=True, extract_relationships=True)
|
|
|
|
os.makedirs("reports", exist_ok=True)
|
|
|
|
kg_viz = KGVisualizer()
|
|
|
|
# Full network — interactive for the analyst portal
|
|
kg_viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/cti_network.html",
|
|
node_color_by = "type",
|
|
node_size_by = "degree",
|
|
hover_data = ["type", "content"],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Attribution path PNG for the slide deck
|
|
kg_viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "static",
|
|
file_path = "reports/apt29_sunburst_path.png",
|
|
highlight_path = ["APT29", "SUNBURST", "SolarWinds"],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Connectivity overview
|
|
av = AnalyticsVisualizer()
|
|
av.visualize_connectivity(
|
|
connectivity = {"is_connected": True, "num_components": 1, "component_sizes": [24]},
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/connectivity.html",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# CVE-2024-3400 incident timeline
|
|
tv = TemporalVisualizer()
|
|
tv.visualize_timeline(
|
|
temporal_data = {"events": [
|
|
{"id": "pub", "label": "CVE-2024-3400 published", "timestamp": "2024-03-14"},
|
|
{"id": "exp", "label": "Zero-day exploitation", "timestamp": "2024-03-26"},
|
|
{"id": "patch", "label": "PAN-OS hotfix released", "timestamp": "2024-04-14"},
|
|
{"id": "rem", "label": "Remediation confirmed", "timestamp": "2024-04-30"},
|
|
]},
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "reports/cve_timeline.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
</Tab>
|
|
|
|
<Tab title="Security — SOC/Incident">
|
|
|
|
During an active incident, the SOC generates a lateral movement network with the attack path highlighted, a centrality ranking to identify which hosts are most pivotal, and a relationship matrix to show who connects to what.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.context import ContextGraph
|
|
from semantica.visualization import KGVisualizer, AnalyticsVisualizer
|
|
|
|
graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
|
|
|
|
for node_id, ntype, content in [
|
|
("wkstn-047", "Host", "Compromised workstation WKSTN-047"),
|
|
("dc01", "Host", "Domain controller DC01"),
|
|
("jsmith", "User", "Compromised user jsmith"),
|
|
("psexec", "Tool", "PsExec lateral movement tool"),
|
|
("t1021", "MITRE", "T1021.002 SMB/Admin Shares"),
|
|
]:
|
|
graph.add_node(node_id, ntype, content)
|
|
|
|
graph.add_edge("wkstn-047", "dc01", "lateral_movement", weight=1.0)
|
|
graph.add_edge("jsmith", "wkstn-047","session_on", weight=0.9)
|
|
graph.add_edge("psexec", "wkstn-047","executed_on", weight=1.0)
|
|
graph.add_edge("psexec", "t1021", "implements", weight=0.95)
|
|
|
|
viz = KGVisualizer()
|
|
|
|
# Incident network with lateral movement path highlighted
|
|
viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "soc/incident_graph.html",
|
|
node_color_by = "type",
|
|
highlight_path = ["wkstn-047", "dc01"],
|
|
hover_data = ["type", "content"],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Relationship matrix — who connects to what
|
|
viz.visualize_relationship_matrix(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "soc/rel_matrix.html",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Centrality rankings — which host is most pivotal?
|
|
av = AnalyticsVisualizer()
|
|
av.visualize_centrality_rankings(
|
|
centrality = {"wkstn-047": 0.35, "dc01": 0.28, "psexec": 0.22, "jsmith": 0.15},
|
|
centrality_type = "degree",
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "soc/centrality.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
</Tab>
|
|
|
|
<Tab title="Life Science — Clinical/Pharma">
|
|
|
|
A drug repurposing exploration: interactive drug-target-disease network, OWL class hierarchy, UMAP embedding projection, and a similarity heatmap to spot structurally equivalent compounds.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.context import AgentContext, ContextGraph
|
|
from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore
|
|
from semantica.visualization import KGVisualizer, EmbeddingVisualizer, OntologyVisualizer
|
|
from semantica.ontology import OntologyGenerator
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
|
|
ctx = AgentContext(
|
|
vector_store=VectorStore(backend="faiss", dimension=768),
|
|
knowledge_graph=graph,
|
|
graph_expansion=True,
|
|
)
|
|
ctx.store([
|
|
"Metformin activates AMPK and reduces hepatic glucose production in Type 2 Diabetes.",
|
|
"Dapagliflozin inhibits SGLT2 and reduces cardiovascular mortality in HFrEF.",
|
|
"Semaglutide agonises GLP-1R and reduces HbA1c in obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.",
|
|
], extract_entities=True, extract_relationships=True)
|
|
|
|
kg_viz = KGVisualizer()
|
|
kg_viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "drug_kg.html",
|
|
node_color_by = "type",
|
|
node_size_by = "degree",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# OWL class hierarchy
|
|
ontology = OntologyGenerator(
|
|
base_uri="https://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DRUG_",
|
|
min_occurrences=1,
|
|
).generate_from_graph(graph.to_dict())
|
|
|
|
ov = OntologyVisualizer()
|
|
ov.visualize_hierarchy(ontology, output="interactive", file_path="drug_hierarchy.html")
|
|
ov.visualize_structure(ontology, output="interactive", file_path="drug_ontology.html")
|
|
|
|
# UMAP projection and similarity heatmap for drug embeddings
|
|
embeddings = np.array([[0.1, 0.2, 0.3], [0.15, 0.22, 0.31], [0.8, 0.7, 0.6]])
|
|
labels = ["Metformin", "Dapagliflozin", "Semaglutide"]
|
|
|
|
ev = EmbeddingVisualizer()
|
|
# UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) reduces high-dimensional
|
|
# embeddings to 2D while preserving local neighborhood structure
|
|
ev.visualize_2d_projection(
|
|
embeddings, labels, method="umap",
|
|
output="interactive", file_path="drug_embeddings.html",
|
|
)
|
|
ev.visualize_similarity_heatmap(
|
|
embeddings, labels,
|
|
output="interactive", file_path="drug_similarity.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
</Tab>
|
|
|
|
<Tab title="Banking — Risk/Compliance">
|
|
|
|
Regulatory knowledge graph for model governance: entity network, OWL class hierarchy for documentation, and a graph growth curve across quarterly Basel III updates — all in static PNG for the model governance committee pack.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from semantica.context import ContextGraph
|
|
from semantica.change_management import TemporalVersionManager
|
|
from semantica.visualization import KGVisualizer, TemporalVisualizer, OntologyVisualizer
|
|
from semantica.ontology import OntologyGenerator
|
|
|
|
graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
|
|
vm = TemporalVersionManager(storage_path="regulatory_versions.db")
|
|
|
|
for node, ntype, content in [
|
|
("bcbs-cre20", "Regulation", "Basel III CRE20 — CRE capital requirements"),
|
|
("metric-ltv", "Metric", "Loan-to-Value Ratio"),
|
|
("metric-dscr", "Metric", "Debt Service Coverage Ratio"),
|
|
("metric-pd", "Metric", "Probability of Default"),
|
|
("metric-lgd", "Metric", "Loss Given Default"),
|
|
]:
|
|
graph.add_node(node, ntype, content)
|
|
|
|
graph.add_edge("bcbs-cre20", "metric-ltv", "requires", weight=1.0)
|
|
graph.add_edge("bcbs-cre20", "metric-dscr", "requires", weight=1.0)
|
|
graph.add_edge("bcbs-cre20", "metric-pd", "requires", weight=0.9)
|
|
graph.add_edge("bcbs-cre20", "metric-lgd", "requires", weight=0.9)
|
|
|
|
kg_viz = KGVisualizer()
|
|
kg_viz.visualize_network(
|
|
graph = graph.to_dict(),
|
|
output = "static",
|
|
file_path = "regulatory/regulatory_kg.png",
|
|
node_color_by = "type",
|
|
node_size_by = "degree",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# OWL hierarchy — static PNG for the documentation appendix
|
|
ontology = OntologyGenerator(
|
|
base_uri="https://basel.eba.eu/ontology/",
|
|
min_occurrences=1,
|
|
).generate_from_graph(graph.to_dict())
|
|
|
|
ov = OntologyVisualizer()
|
|
ov.visualize_hierarchy(ontology, output="static", file_path="regulatory/class_hierarchy.png")
|
|
|
|
# Graph growth curve across quarterly snapshots
|
|
tv = TemporalVisualizer()
|
|
tv.visualize_metrics_evolution(
|
|
metrics_history = {
|
|
"node_count": [12, 18, 25, 31],
|
|
"edge_count": [8, 15, 24, 32],
|
|
},
|
|
timestamps = ["2025-01-01", "2025-04-01", "2025-07-01", "2025-10-01"],
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "regulatory/graph_growth.html",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Snapshot comparison — what changed between Q2 and Q3 Basel update?
|
|
snap1 = vm.get_version("basel_q2_2025")
|
|
snap2 = vm.get_version("basel_q3_2025")
|
|
if snap1 and snap2:
|
|
tv.visualize_snapshot_comparison(
|
|
snapshots = {"basel_q2_2025": snap1, "basel_q3_2025": snap2},
|
|
output = "interactive",
|
|
file_path = "regulatory/snapshot_diff.html",
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
</Tab>
|
|
|
|
</Tabs>
|
|
|
|
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
**Rendering massive graphs.** Attempting to visualize graphs with thousands of nodes crashes browsers and creates uninterpretable hairballs. Always filter large graphs to meaningful subsets before visualization.
|
|
|
|
**Treating visual proximity as proof of relationships.** Nodes that appear close in a visualization aren't necessarily closely related in the graph structure. Visual layout algorithms optimize for readability, not semantic accuracy.
|
|
|
|
**Visualizing duplicate/unclean data.** Duplicate entities, inconsistent naming, and data quality issues are amplified in visualizations. Clean your graph data before creating visual presentations for stakeholders.
|
|
|
|
**Overloading tooltips with huge text fields.** Hovering over a node shouldn't display entire document contents. Include only essential metadata in hover tooltips — entity type, name, and key properties.
|
|
|
|
**Running visualizations before graph cleanup.** Visualizations reflect data quality issues directly. Entities with inconsistent names, duplicate nodes, and missing relationships create confusing and misleading visual representations.
|
|
|
|
## Output Modes
|
|
|
|
Every visualizer method accepts the same two output modes:
|
|
|
|
| `output` value | Format | Best for |
|
|
| :------------- | :----- | :------- |
|
|
| `"interactive"` | Self-contained HTML (Plotly / pyvis) | Jupyter notebooks, analyst portals, email attachments |
|
|
| `"static"` | PNG / SVG (Matplotlib) | PDF reports, slide decks, regulatory submissions |
|
|
|
|
To get the figure object instead of writing to disk, omit `file_path`:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
fig = viz.visualize_network(graph.to_dict(), output="interactive")
|
|
fig.show() # renders inline in Jupyter
|
|
fig.write_html("out.html") # manual export
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Related Guides
|
|
|
|
- [Context Graphs](context-graphs) — `graph.to_dict()` is the primary input for `KGVisualizer`
|
|
- [Ontology Management](ontology) — `OntologyVisualizer` renders ontologies produced by `OntologyGenerator`
|
|
- [Change Management](change-management) — `TemporalVersionManager` snapshots feed `visualize_metrics_evolution()` and `visualize_snapshot_comparison()`
|
|
- [Graph Analytics](graph-analytics) — centrality scores, community dicts, and connectivity results that feed the `AnalyticsVisualizer`
|
|
- [Export & Serialization](export) — export the same graph to GraphML, GEXF, or DOT for Gephi and Graphviz
|